I was going to write a defense of Proteus today. Having followed the series of posts from Gamasutra blogs to then Ed responding, I was getting ready to write an angry post about how I love Proteus, think it’s one of the most delightful games I’ve played in a long time, and found Ed, when I talked to him myself weeks ago, to be an incredibly interesting designer who is finding ways to challenge the first-person genre.
I’ve decided to change my plan. Instead of bringing you what I think in my own words, I am going to select quotes from various sources that I think highlight important parts of the discourse surrounding Proteus.
“Proteus is a game of pure exploration. There are no puzzles, no challenge – excepting any challenges you may set for yourself. In the brief time I’ve played so far, I climbed a mountain and descended through a thick cloud layer into a gentle rain. I saw stars fall and then danced with them upon the ground. I saw the seasons change.” Corvus Elrod
“I haven’t played this game or even know anything about it really, but if you’re going to sell something, it better include an actual game with gameplay, or at least advertise itself for what it really is. Generally, if you buy something on Steam, you kind of expect it to be an actual game.” MouseMilk (Comment on “Proteus’ Creator Defends His Game—as a Game“)
“Well, I too think that Proteus is not a game. But I do not mean it as “is not good enough to be a game” or something like that.
Is just something different that doesn’t compare to the game category.
A lot of programs are not a game. Power point allows you to create and visualize slides… it is not a game, it’s value is not decreased by the fact that is not a game.
Of course in a gamer circuit “not a game” sounds derogative. But still, you have a product, you have people interested in that product, you have people who see value in your product… isn’t that what’s important?” Simone Tanzi (Comment on “Is Proteus a game — and if not, who cares?“)
“I asked my class, after they played Proteus, whether they thought it was a game. They all said \’yes\’. Why? \’Because we just played it\’.
“Proteus sounds like it is primarily a toy. Like most toys, it’s not about what the toy is capable of per se, it’s more about what the user can figure out to do with the toy. If you watch kids play with their toys, the toys are just props facilitating some sort of pretend-play.
The controversy around these products is muddled because of the demand that they be referred to as games. If you approach them expecting an actual game, you’re going to be disappointed. If you approach them without this expectation, you might enjoy them, if you’re into what they’re offering.
The definition of the word “game” has been around far longer than computers. We need to stop trying to force the definition of the term to expand to fit products that have nothing to do with the word.” Matt Robb (Comment on “Opinion: It’s totally OK to not like ‘anti-games’“)
“One of the remarkable things a game can offer is the ability to get lost in a world–to go on journeys, to explore. Few games can truly capture the idyllic, child-like magic of a good saunter–most of the time, traveling is a means to get somewhere, to do something. It’s utilitarian, or unremarkable.” Patricia Hernandez
“Finally, I’m not feeling brought down by this whole argument, though it’s regrettable to me that Proteus is being used as such a prominent example. We’ve had such an amazing wave of nice messages and good write-ups that the number of people who dislike it feels irrelevant. From a practical point of view, it looks like it should make enough in sales to pay for development time on a new project. After a long and uncertain development, and a very stressful January, it feels amazingly freeing.” Ed Key, designer of Proteus.